Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
看之前被海报吸引了，看完觉得就这？还有，小女孩的妈妈是不是那个演祖国人的奶妈？
不得不说，拍的是真差！毁了我童年小说。集体作弊是什么鬼？！
作为成年人来说真的满场bug，甚至角色和剧情也都设计得很极端，但作为童话和他想批判的唯分数论来说，丢掉脑子也是看得下去的xxx就挺适合让家长看的hhhh
父母不仅生活上照料孩子，还应精神上关心孩子。
圆梦童年~皮皮鲁和鲁西西是八零后，所以电影呈现的是九十年代的风格，大白兔奶糖，红绿水壶，圆罐头，焦虑的妈妈们，我已经不记得从前看的鲁西西和罐头小人的故事是怎样的了，但是无论故事怎样我都很激动，身边都是爸爸妈妈带着孩子来看电影，也许和我一样，更多的是为了圆自己小时候的梦吧！最高光时刻就是最后的彩蛋了，路人郑渊洁大叔~希望更多的郑渊洁宇宙能搬上荧幕！
基本忠于原著吧，里面很多台词和桥段都是意向深刻的。毕竟这是我最幸福的童年的记忆。还不错吧。
看着奇奇怪怪的家庭，一家四口，可能只是将矛盾和人性的恶放大了的普通家庭。还挺新鲜的片子！
按这样，应该是3星水平，
其实有点无聊。因为剧情实在太简单了，简单到可以预见结局，这种怪异变种看多了就这样
有一点点像黑天鹅，toxic的母女关系，完美主义控制狂母亲，女孩的青春期性启蒙性压抑……
郑渊洁的小说的确很难改编成电影，部分演员的演技也有点尬，主角的演技还是很不错的！
严苛的母亲，懦弱的父亲，冷血的弟弟，多重buff叠加在一起的家庭，缇娅过得很不开心，她孵化出来的自己是对自己的一份温存，然后终究有一天，缇娅会吞噬了自己
更应该认为是一个复仇故事，“你夺走了我的母亲，我夺走你的女儿”。小女孩的母亲是现代社会典型的表演型人格，社交媒体上呈现的是最完美的一面，跟丈夫和和气气、一对儿女漂漂亮亮，有一座带花园的院子，枝形吊灯、沙发套和地毯交汇出一片温柔的色调，直到一只误闯的乌鸦出现，用利爪彻底撕破了这张平静美好的画布。紧接着，内心的暴戾很快以杀戮的形式施予这名不速之客，你知道，她不会再有好结果。至于家庭关系中的裂痕似乎都在意料之中：跟丈夫的开放式关系、对女儿的苛刻并不亚于最残忍的亚洲母亲式“鸡娃”，儿子则基本被她忽视，毫无存在感。要对这样一个女人复仇，必须要夺走的是她最心爱的女儿以及她的希望，让她不再有退路。而她“如同尸体分泌黏液”一样的本质的生活，将恶心她自己并恶心所有人。至于恐怖片的“借尸还魂”倒不是什么新招了。
女孩经期第一次的到来，母亲的掌控欲杀死了孩童纯真的年纪，孵化了女儿的叛逆的变化
把象征实体化，把隐喻明朗化。鸟以呕吐物为食，所咀嚼和吞咽的就是这家庭里的腐烂物。鸟是女孩内心的暗面，是杀戮欲，是毁灭欲，利爪撕碎完美假象，除掉竞争对手，女孩残存的善和良知与之搏斗，最终混为一体又彼此交互。很有趣的小实验，很文学，用影像呈现能达到这种荒诞和现实交织的临界感，已经很不容易。
这个小女孩瘦骨嶙峋的样子莫名让我想到钛（。。一般
感觉没演完，真正恐怖的不应该是怪鸟真正变成女儿以后的事情么？
再次呼吁关注家庭关系和亲子关系。有些父母总说自己的孩子长着长着就变成了怪物，殊不知是自己自己酿出的苦果。不过影片的一大bug就是既然和老公无爱，又怎么搞出了老二？？
个人还蛮喜欢的，不能算是怎样的恐怖片吧，但是黑暗童话系风格明显。荒诞猎奇感，画风还是非常漂亮的，尤其是小女主的表现，非常不错。
还好疫情给我票退了，不然领人家在电影院看这多少有点丢人了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
