Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
说实话，没那么烂，就是剧情的铺垫有点少了，再多点男主男二的相爱相杀就好了。还有最后的彩蛋真的是智障，明明第一部预告片不是这样的剧情。
在我眼里和迪家近两年的作品《黑寡妇》《十戒》也没差太多，至少档次比之《毒液》不要好太多。可能期待值拉到最低，特效和动作还不错？
“像我这样的濒死状态，还是很有吸引力的。”索尼这是把自家的漫威元素一次过吃干抹净啊，强行和蜘蛛侠联动也让人觉得反感。兄弟相残的英雄片大俗套，油画质感的特效设计有些新意，可考虑到评级因素吸血鬼吸的都是空气。
可以说没什么惊喜，特效有了，打斗却不行，太水了。主角明明比男二更快觉醒，更熟悉技能，即使不想杀男二，也不可能完全被男二吊打呀。最后的决战，主角就那样召唤一堆蝙蝠，来一个龟派气功就压倒男二？男二明明比主角迅捷，还能被主角插中？女主真漂亮。FBI反应真迟钝的，男二杀了这么多人，才想起找摄像头。全篇过多的篇幅叙述超能力的获得的过程。有趣的场面太少。光是看着都能猜到接下来的剧情。平平无奇。
吸血鬼的设定没有充分利用起来，本来可以加入更多的善恶挣扎元素。故事情节很流水化，没有惊喜，部分炫目的打斗场景还是可以值3星
血液博士研发了变身吸血鬼的针剂，然后两吸血鬼大战，最后召唤蝙蝠大军一招制敌，然后留了两个莫名其妙的彩蛋。
画面和质感相当不错，就是剧本故事太水了，流水账一样，不过这个百特曼还挺好看的，但也太工具了，就为了串上蜘蛛侠和毒液吗？心疼少爷，还是回DC当小丑吧，
他喵的，不行。如果不是半夜吃泡面，真的是会看不下去，太差太烂了，也没有什么美感，是角色的原因吗。
好，无聊，的，剧情。莱托贡献了正常的演技和超高的颜值与身材，MS的反派也很讨喜，蝙蝠声波感应特效做得不错，很流畅。只有编剧，贡献了选低于水准线的剧情，太拉了，每一段都…………另外蝙蝠脸真的太丑了，正片结尾那个特写都能算恐怖片了吧？女主觉醒真的很 不 合 理，而且那个镜头特别暮光
这不就是吸血鬼吗，男主在船上拿血清的那一刻我就知道他好朋友要成反派了。
6.5分。其实总体还可以，就是有点90年代B级片的感觉
故事情节太简单了吧～反派Milo真是毫无意义的存在。变身后的视觉效果还是到位了，不管是飞翔还是声波定位都挺好看的，女助理的颜也非常在线。不满的地方在于为什么把NYC刻画成了哥谭市。至于说片子太划水不深刻之类的评价，也感觉完全没必要，难道指望看一部吸血鬼版的达拉斯买家俱乐部吗？
动机全没有，人人都是聪b，除了f话连篇就是解释性台词，这剧本我奶奶都能写
真正的“蝙蝠”侠，但蝙蝠也没这么强壮啊…
可能因为一边看一边在工作，反倒没觉得有蝠同享那么不堪忍受。奇怪的就是好像这个片子的主创压根没想好自己到底应该处于哪个宇宙中呢？一会儿蜘蛛侠一会儿毒液一会儿又暗示X战警， DC都学会独立成篇拍自己的了，还蹭啥宇宙啊。啊女主角真漂亮，当年演过《毒枭》，跟冈萨雷斯长相很相似，气质很不同。
这真是《异星觉醒》、《藏身之所》的丹尼尔·伊斯皮诺萨导的？？？怎么烂成这个样子？莱托这是打算接凯奇的棒做票房毒药吗？莫比亚斯可以每个月拿Adria Arjona演的马汀的tampon泡茶喝解渴吗？1080P 22/05/17
剧本太弱，对不起莱兔少爷和鞋拔子脸十一博士的演技和对峙。初衷是复制上个世纪八十年代的那种复古叙事，如同莱托少爷上一部复古作品《蛛丝马迹》一样，用了三大影帝（丹泽尔华盛顿，拉米马雷克，莱托）来构建人物张力，但是核心事件薄弱，叙事也过于保守，看起来是在铺垫剧情张力，实际上是里面太多无效叙事，使得整体观感拖沓冗长，激发点稀缺。观众看得昏昏欲睡！
5.5分。仿佛回到漫威20年前的杂牌英雄电影水平。
2022年了，酒吧外小巷有监控而地铁人流区没有，警探还是看到监控提示才去查看。典型的我为你好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
