A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
真正的女主在1997年被判了29年，据说2016年就被释放了，少坐了十年牢。
用了两个半小时看了一场GUCCI家族的内卷故事，结果却是螳螂捕蝉黄雀在后。其实为财产为权利，小到家庭大到国家，类似的故事数不胜数。最大的收获可能只是通过影片更了解了GUCCI这个品牌。Lady Gaga饰演的Patrizia还是比较惊艳的，完全表现出了一个女人对名利的欲望和野心，同时也暴露了在阶级固化的社会，虽然有些小聪明，但是底层的生活环境也限制了眼界和修养。更像是一种贪得无厌的暴发户心态。Maurizio则是很典型的高知商人行为，不失优雅和礼貌的抢夺利好，成功后慢慢物质化，最后失败。影片叙事流水，时长偏长，语言选择也很迷，观感寡淡无味。
卡司挺强，题材也够有关注度，何况是这么一个全球有影响的品牌。不知是不是两位主演不够靓帅，还是编剧技巧有问题，抑或是主演的演技太low，反正这电影感觉挺一般，连床戏看着都假，让人觉得没啥兴趣。既是豪门恩怨，又有黑社会参与，何不换个路子拍呢？
剧情有点平淡，时长过长，节奏也慢，像流水账没有高潮。
很特别的人物变化线路，结尾不知道是什么主题，但就是莫名好笑。喜剧无疑了。
人物动机一片混乱，角色干瘪又机械，纯粹是推动情节的工具，不过对白处理水平能勉强过关，视听和服化道也保持在雷德利斯科特出品的平均水准。
Gaga演的这么用力又这么浮夸，这就已经是可以各种提名的演技吗？为小李子不值…
大概是主角们都太坏了（也有可能是太有钱了）吧，真的很难共情。
凑了这么些人弄了本流水账，鸡零狗碎和时尚哪里搭边。不过反正现如今Gucci也就那样吧。
败家子狗血故事。lady Gaga演技还是不错的。
了解了古驰的历史。片子的节奏推进很稳。好莱坞拍这种片子很有水准。
凑了这么些人弄了本流水账，鸡零狗碎和时尚哪里搭边。不过反正现如今Gucci也就那样吧。
前半段“有钱男孩子在外一定要保护好自己”，后半段“狗男人去死吧” | 审美很奇异的堂弟居然是莱托？？！
剧本太差，白瞎了那么多知名演员，剧情十分肥皂剧，要不是亚当司机怎么看都好看差点就弃剧了。其实这故事真令人唏嘘，意大利家族没落，代表着资本主义的私募基金和Tom Ford是大赢家。
gucci家族史真有意思，gaga演的不错
請別再揶揄什麼錢多有什麼了不起、情緒過度浮誇和虛偽、故事狗血……等等，莫笑朱門酒肉臭，待你真有如此財富或能量時，才有資格再做批判吧。
很特别的人物变化线路，结尾不知道是什么主题，但就是莫名好笑。喜剧无疑了。
雷霆嘎嘎木楞的感情戏和夸张的动作戏也算是跟女主俗气老土偏执疯魔的设定相得益彰了，有些地方尴尬得连美杜莎看了都要被石化。她故作天真地说I don't know her的时候会想到牛姐吗？
卡司很牛但家族各演各的，看他們同臺飆戲就好難受。Paolo的暴躁被萊托演成了小丑藝術家既瘋又傻的感覺（？）在綫祈禱嘎嘎女士不要去演小丑2裡的哈莉🙏🏻但不得不說快結尾處嘎嘎和神婆兩人的打扮確實酷。
男主的一下子的转变没有任何铺垫，前后太割裂了，像是两部电影
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
