Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
阿婆迷暴走：这《尼罗河上的惨案》是针对《尼罗河上的惨案》的惨案！
为什么豆瓣不能打零分，真的求求导演不要再拍阿婆了，能把阿婆的作品拍的这么烂也是没谁了
又名《It's always the husband》
主线氛围不错结局看了个寂寞…四个小故事还可，虽然是做旧94年伪纪录片道具和特殊化妆也一起复古了是怎么回事……鼠人克味十足，机械改造人比较完整硬核但跳脱过头了说是豚鼠系列更合适，意外的是午夜梦回时守灵人的故事最惊悚，看的时候觉得挺平庸但那半个脑袋不停在脑海闪现是怎么回事草
居然用了一半的篇幅做案发前的铺垫，作为侦探片这节奏掌控是不是也太随意了点。。。不过比起前作“东方列车”，多了不少风光可看，还挺美的….
剧情过于松垮，推断在前文中又暗示不足，拍摄技术是先进了，但是电影本身却更下乘了。
肯尼斯布拉纳的导演水平和他在《哈利波特与密室》里演的洛哈特教授一样华而不实。PS，而且他和洛哈特一样自恋！不停给自己加戏，加破坏叙事节奏且毫无意义的特写！
很经典的剧本而且百拍不厌。就是不能跟老版相提并论。波罗的演员每次都要自导自演那口法语式英文听的好别扭。惊艳的还是linnett果然不是谁都能当神奇女侠的。jackie再也不神经质了反而无时不卖弄。simon就是无存在感的透明额。
开头跳舞就把我尬住了，侦探的黄昏恋看的莫名其妙，可能为了突出主题爱吧
导演/编剧/主演三合一，视效无敌，应该很懂情欲，毫不吝啬激情张力，盖尔加朵那场舞戏加上前面妹子一直热吻，感觉两个订婚都是因为被睡服了orz。这种事儿吧，各人幸福感实在是差别太大了
故事就那么回事吧，能猜到凶手没猜到手法。推理部分有点弱，布拉纳应该多做下前半段的剧场感。这一版波洛还挺人性的，有意思，布拉纳演的也还行，就是拍的一般。btw把埃及拍太美了吧！想去
没看过原著但是不得不说电影的推理过程着实很仓促，突然就分析出来了。。。
金光灿灿的埃及风光和橘红色调的尼罗河风光，尼罗河游船之旅暗藏杀机。开头十分钟仿佛走错片场的黑白一战场面应该另拍成一部前传电影！符合预期，铺垫太长，只有审问和结果公布，缺失推理过程。油腻锤子哥演渣男实在太合适不过，假惺惺的痛哭大笑，我都笑出声了！淡忘了原著中的重要情节，反让观影途中获得紧张的悬疑感和未知感。虽为胶片拍摄，但和《丛林奇航》一样塑料感CG假到爆棚，全程绿幕电影？Emma Mackey演技绘声绘色，狡黠邪魅的表演过目难忘，比Samara Weaving更像Margot Robbie，三人啥时候组成三姐妹？看了半晌才认出久违多年的Russell Brand！Annette Bening风韵犹存，上一部的《东方快车谋杀案》有Michelle Pfeiffer，这一部有同为美女老戏骨的她，真好啊！[2.23看的]
创新太难，命题作文更难。可以理解，无法原谅。
Cult依旧，邪典奔放，但有点类型单一，人体机械很赞…
（6.0/10）简陋的CG水平开始让人以为是经费紧张，后来大面积地放弃治疗倒给人了一种布拉纳在刻意舞台化的幻觉。经典名著影视化改编从来看的是各个年代不同电影人独特的诠释角度，哪怕像是科恩的麦克白至少也在摄影上贡献良多。本片一直貌似在补全乌斯季诺夫那版无法充分展示的埃及美景之中的隐喻，可是虚假的特效让人大倒胃口。
推理过程太短太粗糙了导致张力不够，Armie哭戏太暴露演技Gal则短板尽显，风景大部分有棚拍的马脚，各种镜头炫技则觉得没有必要。好好拍悬疑揭秘可能会成功许多。
视效max，盖尔加朵女神颜值max，这版的菠萝演的挺好的，就是剧本有点降智连带菠萝也显得降智，甚至还不如谋杀疑案有趣，不知道是否原作就是这样？
反转挺有意思，一切都展示给观众了，但是需要一点儿化学或者美术知识才能注意到。遗憾之处在于请了盖尔加朵，但是既没有展示她的力量感，妆容也没有展示她的美。另外感觉前中期有很多环节不完整，是因为时长缘故被删减了吗？
6.0/10 分。初看，蓝光。中规中矩吧。艾玛·麦基，《性爱自修室》，难怪这么眼熟。。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
