Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
感谢昆仑字幕组，翻译的很好，表述到位，会议室的辩论尤其精彩，恍惚有十二怒汉的意境———却突然发现：这是在讨论数百万人的生命而非一个人，一群演员居然一个不认识，打破了德国只有20名演员的传统—-没一张熟脸，百拍不厌的二战题材，反思到骨髓里的德国人，是否看到了现在世界的乌纳呢———————翻了下演員表，级別最高那位居然是《公猫》的男二！颠覆啊，加一星
那些犯下人间最残暴罪行的人都以为自己发现了天国之路，历史的责任感有时候只是一种自欺欺人的错觉
太绝了这电影 那种感觉把控的太好了！男主演技很🉑️好会演
我是一名享乐主义的老绅士，我热爱生活，但我也逐渐在失去生活，可我并没有准备好接受这个事实。
1 有一個大反派 導致了悲劇 如「天鵝湖」
魏玛式的魏玛故事，末日将至的世界反而眼花缭乱。带着任务看，才发现“学会游泳”一闪而过好几次。
好惊喜的影片，1931年的故事背景却完全没有时代距离感，反而是触手可及的亲切。散文般的叙事手法将正直、善良、纯粹的男主娓娓道来，三小时一点不觉得漫长。
德国当下最好的男演员之一…时代背景大轮廓，讲了一个不温不火的事件，不太能体会到价值感，文字会比影视冲击感更强么？不懂了
道德上的计算与算术是不同的。
活着只是侥幸，死亡才是必然
无法忍受这种一个场景讲完整部电影的文本对话，根本就浪费了电影形式本身优势，甚至还凸显了其对大段文本表现的缺点，无法被观众快速吸收，无法停下来思考，只能囫囵吞枣的带过。这根本不需要导演，也不需要演员，不如出个短篇小说，或者这本就是将历史记录照抄上了银幕。
A movie adaptation of the novel of the same name by Erich Kästner.
每个人都高声倾诉自己对肉体、爱情、理想的追逐，它们并不刺耳，却更接近于露骨的克制、坦诚的欺瞒等一切矛盾体。纳粹阴翳下，破碎的故事、不合时宜的摇滚、荒唐的尸体艺术和无法重逢的爱，意识流入长河，白惨惨的日光下，但愿我们都曾享有并成为无用的美。
犹太财团的历史造假片，万湖会议记录这是商议将德国人聚集区的犹太人转移到东部做工而避免在核心区搞破坏。
羊🐏，鹿🦌，鸟🐦。
如此大的邪恶，以一场相对文明的会议形式达成。
一天晚上我梦到我失去了她，我的恐惧让我感到羞愧。
我沉醉其中，放眼望去已经无处可去，时代的轮回无可避免，万物生又万物落。
我今年看过最忧郁的电影。没有什么不合时宜，毁灭是我们的命运。
用前30分钟迷幻、荒诞、疯狂的视听还原30年代的德国，再用150分钟的传统叙事去塑造迷失于动荡年代中的青年一代；汤姆希林自身独特的气质很好的诠释了文青法比安身上的文艺气息 ★★★☆
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
